Called the "Belated Thank You to the Merchant Mariners of World War II Act of 2009", its purpose is
"To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish the Merchant Mariner Equity Compensation Fund to provide benefits to certain individuals who served in the United States merchant marine (including the Army Transport Service and the Naval Transport Service) during World War II."From the House Veterans Affairs Committee:
Filner Reintroduces Belated Thank You to the Merchant Mariners of World War II ActA fuller explanation of the need for this bill is provided by the Seafarers International Union:
Chairmutive comment. No further action was taken on the he bill before the 108th Congress adjourned last year, so Filner reintroduced it as H.R. 23 before the new Congress which convened last month.
As reported earlier in the Seafarers LOG, H.R. 3729 among other things called for compensation of $1,000 per month for people in any service in harm’s way—including the U.S. Merchant Marine—during the period from Dec. 5, 1941 through Dec. 31, 1946, the same period as all other GI Bills. The bill also stipulated that any surviving wife of a qualified veteran also shall be eligible to receive the same benefit as the veteran.
In official remarks to fellow members of Congress in 2004, Filner noted, World War II Merchant Mariners suffered the second-highest casualty rate of any of the branches of services while they delivered troops, tanks, food, airplanes, fuel and other needed supplies to every theater of the war. Compared to the large number of men and women serving in World War II, the numbers of merchant mariners were small, but their chance of dying during service was extremely high. Enemy forces sank over 800 ships between 1941 and 1944 alone.
Filner further pointed out mariners weren�rred to the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.
"‘Belated Thank You’ legislation reintroduced by U.S. Rep. Filner (1/13)
U.S. Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) earlier this month introduced a bill before the 109th Congress to amend title 46, United States Code, and title II of the Social Security Act.
The bill, H.R. 23, would provide benefits to certain individuals who served in the United States Merchant Marine (including the Army Transport Service and the Naval Transport Service) during World War II.
Filner last year (Jan. 27, 2004) introduced the same legislation before the 108th Congress. That bill, numbered H.R. 3729 and titled the “Belated Thank You to the Merchant Mariners of World War II Act of 2004,” had more than 150 cosponsors. The last major action taken on it came July 27 when the Veterans’ Affairs Committee asked for executive comment. No further action was taken on the bill before the 108th Congress adjourned last year, so Filner reintroduced it as H.R. 23 before the new Congress which convened last month.
As reported earlier in the Seafarers LOG, H.R. 3729 among other things called for compensation of $1,000 per month for people in any service in harm’s way—including the U.S. Merchant Marine—during the period from Dec. 5, 1941 through Dec. 31, 1946, the same period as all other GI Bills. The bill also stipulated that any surviving wife of a qualified veteran also shall be eligible to receive the same benefit as the veteran.
In official remarks to fellow members of Congress in 2004, Filner noted, World War II Merchant Mariners suffered the second-highest casualty rate of any of the branches of services while they delivered troops, tanks, food, airplanes, fuel and other needed supplies to every theater of the war. Compared to the large number of men and women serving in World War II, the numbers of merchant mariners were small, but their chance of dying during service was extremely high. Enemy forces sank over 800 ships between 1941 and 1944 alone.
Filner further pointed out mariners weren’t included in the GI Bill of Rights, which Congress enacted in 1945. “The merchant marine became the forgotten service,” he said. “The fact that merchant seamen had borne arms during wartime in the defense of their country did not seem to matter.”
Many WWII mariners finally received veterans’ recognition in 1988, along with access to what Filner described as a “watered-down” GI Bill. It took another 10 years to extend the cutoff date for recognition of mariners as veterans so it matched the date utilized by the military.
A member of the U.S. House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Filner observed, “While it is impossible to make up for over 40 years of unpaid benefits, I propose a bill that will acknowledge the service of the veterans of the U.S. Merchant Marine and offer compensation for years and years of lost benefits. The average age of (World War II) merchant marine veterans is now 81. Many have outlived their savings. A monthly benefit to compensate for the loss of nearly a lifetime of ineligibility for the GI Bill would be of comfort and would provide some measure of security for veterans of the U.S. Merchant Marine.”
2 comments:
What did my service cost for being a seaman with the Army Transport Service in WW2? I was 16 years 8 months old when I joined. When I returned home there were no jobs and no laws to help get one so I went back to sea as a Merchant Marine. I got my notice to appear at a Draft Board while I was aboard the SS Sue Lykes in Wonson, North Korea supplying ammunition to the military ashore. While in the Army they used my skills as a seaman even taking me off shipment to Fort Lewis for Korea to go aboard a FS (a small freigt ship} going to support the DEW line operation in Newfoundland and North of there. My next assignment was on a training ship as a Boatswain. I served 5 years. I am more proud of my Army Transport Service than I am of the regular Army service
It appears no one in Congress caares or is it we are not enough living Mariners of WW2 to vote for them? There should be less that 5,000 of us living today and most of us are disabled. One has to wonder how so much money can be given to so many causes but not one Congressman or Senator will stand up for us. Just remember I am only one vote but one of them will have to earn it.
Post a Comment