Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Institutional Readmission Requirements for Servicemembers

Servicemembers seeking higher education can have problems when new orders conflict with their college and other arrangements, causing them to drop out of school. When they're able to get back into school again, readmission can sometimes be a problem but under Federal law, they have some protections, as detailed below. If these don't solve the problem, it can be worth consulting state law and perhaps the educational institution's own policies; sometimes college staff members themselves are veterans or otherwise sympathetic to the issue and may be able to dig up an interpretation of their rules to help out a servicemember.
Pay careful attention to the "notice" requirement. While notice is not required if there's a military necessity prevents it, and under the law oral notice may suffice, it is generally speaking a good idea to give notice in writing and to keep a copy of your own. Some people might type up a letter, email it AND send a paper copy; keep the email in an account that will be accessible to you when you need it.
The following FAQ from Ed.Gov describes federal readmission requirements:

1. What do the readmission requirements do?

They require institutions of higher education to promptly readmit with the same academic status a servicemember who was previously admitted to the institution but who did not attend, or did not continue to attend, because of service in the uniformed services.
 TOP


2. What is the purpose of the readmission requirements?
The purpose of the readmission requirements is to minimize the disruption to the lives of servicemembers, allowing them to return to an institution of higher education without penalty for having left because of their service. TOP


3. Where did the readmission requirements come from?
Congress added the requirements to the law in 2008 (section 484C of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or 20 U.S.C. 1091c). The U.S. Department of Education published regulations that further implemented the law on October 29, 2009. Many parts of the law and regulations are based on the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) (38 U.S.C. 4301-4334) which establishes the process for servicemembers to return to employment after serving on active duty. The final regulations can be accessed athttp://www.ifap.ed.gov/fregisters/FR102909GeneralandNonLoanProgrammatic
FinalRule.html
. The United States Code (U.S.C.) can be accessed athttp://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionUScode.action?collectionCode=USCODE.
 TOP


4. When did the readmission requirements become effective?
The law went into effect August 14, 2008 (the day the law was enacted). The regulations went into effect July 1, 2010. The requirements are effective for readmissions of servicemembers on or after those dates. TOP


5. Which institutions of higher education must comply with the readmission requirements?
These requirements apply to any institution of higher education that participates in a Title IV Federal student financial aid program, such as the Pell Grant Program, Stafford Loan Program, or Federal Work-Study Program. For a list of all Title IV Federal student financial aid programs, go to the Department's "Student Aid on the Web" web site athttp://studentaid.ed.gov/PORTALSWebApp/students/english/funding.jsp#01and look under the heading "Federal Student Aid Programs." TOP


6. To whom do the protections of the readmission requirements apply?
The readmission requirements apply to servicemembers who perform service in the uniformed services, whether voluntary or involuntary, in the Armed Forces, including service as a member of the National Guard or Reserve, on active duty, active duty for training, or full-time National Guard duty under Federal authority (but not State authority), for a period of more than 30 consecutive days under a call or order to active duty of more than 30 consecutive days. TOP


7. Do the protections of the readmission requirements apply to servicemembers who must be absent from class for a short period of time to attend training?
No. The readmission requirements apply to servicemembers who have completely withdrawn from an institution for a period of service of more than 30 consecutive days. They do not apply to how an institution handles a servicemember’s absence from class to attend training. TOP


8. Are there any conditions a servicemember must meet to qualify?
Yes. An otherwise eligible servicemember qualifies if:

  1. The institution is given notice of the servicemember’s absence for service.
  2. The cumulative length of absences from the institution by reason of service does not exceed five years.
  3. The servicemember gives notice of his or her intent to return by the applicable time limit.
 TOP


9. What are the requirements for the notice of absence for service?
Notice of absence for service must be provided by the servicemember or an appropriate officer of the Armed Forces or official of the Department of Defense—that is, a commissioned, warrant, or noncommissioned officer authorized to give such notice. The notice of absence for service may be oral or written. It must be provided to an office designated by the institution and must be provided as far in advance as is reasonable under the circumstances. An institution must designate one or more offices that a servicemember may contact to provide such notification. An institution may not require that the notice follow any particular format. An institution may not establish a rule for timeliness (for example, a "brightline" deadline for submission); timeliness must be determined by the facts in a particular case. The notice does not need to indicate whether the servicemember intends to return to the institution. TOP


10. Are there any circumstances under which advance notice of service is not required?
Yes. Advance notice is not required if it is precluded by military necessity (for example, a mission, operation, exercise, or requirement that is classified; or a pending or ongoing mission, operation, exercise, or requirement that may be compromised or otherwise adversely affected by public knowledge). If advance notice was not given and was not precluded by military necessity, the servicemember or appropriate officer of the Armed Forces or official of the Department of Defense may submit an attestation when seeking readmission that the servicemember performed service that necessitated the servicemember's absence. TOP


11. How is a period of absence from the institution before, after, or in between performing service treated in determining the cumulative length of a servicemember's absences from the institution by reason of service?
The cumulative length of a servicemember's absences from the institution for service includes only the time the servicemember spent actually performing service in the uniformed services. A period of absence from the institution before, after, or in between performing service does not count (for example, the period between completing service and returning to the institution). TOP


12. Are there any types of service that do not count toward the five-year cumulative length of absences?
Yes. The five-year cumulative length of absences does not include service--

  • Beyond five years to complete an initial period of obligated service
  • During which servicemember was unable to obtain orders releasing from period of service before the expiration of the five-year period, through no fault of the servicemember
  • Performed by a member of the Armed Forces (including the National Guard and Reserves) who is ordered or retained on active duty under one of the following types of duty:
    • 10 U.S.C. 688 (involuntary active duty by a military retiree);
    • 10 U.S.C. 12301(a) (involuntary active duty in wartime);
    • 10 U.S.C. 12301(g) (retention on active duty while in captive status);
    • 10 U.S.C. 12302 (involuntary active duty during a national emergency for up to 24 months);
    • 10 U.S.C. 12304 (involuntary active duty for an operational mission for up to 270 days);
    • 10 U.S.C. 12305 (involuntary retention on active duty of a critical person during time of crisis or other specific conditions);
    • 14 U.S.C. 331 (involuntary active duty by retired Coast Guard officer);
    • 14 U.S.C. 332 (voluntary active duty by retired Coast Guard officer);
    • 14 U.S.C. 359 (involuntary active duty by retired Coast Guard enlisted member);
    • 14 U.S.C. 360 (voluntary active duty by retired Coast Guard enlisted member);
    • 14 U.S.C. 367 (involuntary retention of Coast Guard enlisted member on active duty); or
    • 14 U.S.C. 712 (involuntary active duty by Coast Guard Reserve member for natural or man-made disasters).
  • Performed by a member of the Armed Forces, including the National Guard and Reserve, who is order to or retained on active duty (other than for training)
    • under any provision of law because of a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress
    • In support, as determined by the Secretary concerned, of an operational mission for which personnel have been ordered to active duty under section 12304 of Title 10, U.S.C.
  • Performed by a member of the Armed Forces, including the National Guard and Reserve, who is
    • Ordered to active duty in support, as determined by the Secretary concerned, of a critical mission or requirement of the Armed Forces (including the National Guard or Reserve)
    • Called into Federal service as a member of the National Guard under Chapter 15 of Title 10 U.S.C., or section 12406 of Title 10 U.S.C., (i.e., called to respond to an invasion, danger of invasion, rebellion, danger of rebellion, insurrection, or the inability of the President with regular forces to execute the laws of the United States).
 TOP


13. What are the requirements for notice of intent to return?
Notice of intent to return must be provided by the servicemember. It may be oral or written and must be provided to an office designated by the institution. An institution must designate one or more offices that a servicemember may contact to provide such notification. An institution may not require that the notice follow any particular format. In addition to providing notice, the servicemember must provide documentation to establish that--

  • He or she has not exceeded the cumulative five-year limit on absences from the institution; and
  • His or her eligibility for readmission has not been terminated (see Q&A21).
Documents that may be used for this purpose include:
  • DD (Department of Defense) 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
  • Copy of duty orders prepared by the facility where the orders were fulfilled carrying an endorsement indicating completion of the described service.
  • Letter from the commanding officer of a Personnel Support Activity or someone of comparable authority.
  • Certificate of completion from military training school.
  • Discharge certificate showing character of service.
  • Copy of extracts from payroll documents showing periods of service.
  • Letter from National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Team Leader or Administrative Officer verifying dates and times of NDMS training or Federal activation.
The types of documents necessary will vary from case to case. Not all of these documents are available or necessary in every instance. An institution may not delay or attempt to avoid readmission of a servicemember by demanding documentation that does not exist, or is not readily available, at the time of readmission.
 TOP


14. What are the time limits for providing notice of intent to return?
Notice of intent to return must be provided not later than three years after the completion of the period of service. For a servicemember who is hospitalized for or convalescing from an illness or injury incurred in, or aggravated during, the performance of service, notice must be provided not later than two years after the end of the period that is necessary for recovery from such illness or injury. TOP


15. Does a servicemember who fails to provide notice of intent to return within the applicable time limit automatically forfeit eligibility for readmission to an institution?
No. A servicemember who fails to provide notice of intent to return within the applicable time period does not automatically forfeit eligibility for readmission to an institution, but is subject to the institution’s established leave of absence policy and general practices. TOP


16. What does it mean to "promptly readmit" a servicemember?
To promptly readmit a servicemember means that an institution must readmit the servicemember into the next class or classes in the servicemember's program beginning after the servicemember provides notice of his or her intent to reenroll, unless the servicemember requests a later date of readmission, or unusual circumstances require the institution to admit the servicemember at a later date. For example, a later date of admission would be justified if an institution must make efforts to help the servicemember become prepared to resume the program, and such efforts would not be completed in time for the servicemember to begin the next class. TOP


17. What does it mean to readmit a servicemember with the same academic status?
To readmit a servicemember with the same academic status means that the institution readmits the servicemember:

  • To the same program, unless the servicemember requests or agrees to admission to another program (if the servicemember’s program is no longer offered, the institution must admit the servicemember to the program that is the most similar);
  • At the same enrollment status (for example, full-time), unless the servicemember requests or agrees to a different enrollment status;
  • With the same number of credit hours or clock hours completed, unless the servicemember is admitted to a different program and the hours are not transferable;
  • With same academic standing (for example, satisfactory academic progress status);
  • For the first academic year, with the same tuition and fee charges as when the servicemember left, unless military benefits will pay the increase, but never more than the institution is charging other students; and
  • For subsequent academic years or for a different program, by assessing tuition and fee charges that are no more than the institution is charging other students.
 TOP


18. What if the servicemember is not prepared to resume the program where he or she left off, or will not be able to complete the program?
The institution must make reasonable efforts at no extra cost to the servicemember to help him or her become prepared, or to enable him or her to complete the program including, but not limited to, providing refresher courses and/or allowing the servicemember to retake a pretest. Reasonable efforts are actions that do not place an undue hardship on the institution. An undue hardship exists if an action requires significant difficulty or expense when considered in light of the overall financial resources of the institution and the impact otherwise of such action on the operation of the institution. TOP


19. Are there any circumstances under which an institution is not required to readmit a servicemember?
Yes. An institution is not required to readmit a servicemember if it determines, after reasonable efforts, that the servicemember is not prepared to resume the program at the point where he or she left off, or is unable to complete the program. In addition, an institution is not required to readmit a servicemember if it determines that there are no reasonable efforts it can take to prepare the servicemember to resume at the point where he or she left off, or to enable the servicemember to complete the program. The institution carries the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the servicemember is not prepared to resume the program with the same academic status at the point where the servicemember left off, or that the servicemember will not be able to complete the program. TOP


20. What if readmitting a servicemember conflicts with State law? For example, what if admitting the servicemember to the same program attended prior to serving would cause a class to exceed the maximum enrollment level set by the State?
These readmission requirements supersede any State law (including any local law or ordinance), contract, agreement, policy, plan, practice, or other matter that reduces, limits, or eliminates in any manner any right or benefit provided by these requirements for the period of enrollment during which the servicemember resumes attendance, and continues to do so as long as the institution is unable to comply with such requirements through other means. Thus, an institution must readmit an eligible servicemember even if doing so would cause a class to exceed the maximum enrollment level set by the State. However, these requirements do not supersede, nullify, or diminish any Federal or State law (including any local law or ordinance), contract, agreement, policy, plan, practice, or other matter that establishes an individual's right or benefit that is MORE beneficial or in addition to these rules. TOP


21. Are there any circumstances under which a servicemember's eligibility for readmission terminates?
Yes. A servicemember's eligibility for readmission terminates upon the occurrence of:

  • A dishonorable or bad conduct discharge.
  • A dismissal of a commissioned officer permitted under section 1161(a) of Title 10 U.S.C. by sentence of a general court martial, in commutation of a sentence of a general court-martial, or, in time of war, by order of the President.
  • A dropping of a commissioned officer from the rolls pursuant to section 1161(b), Title 10 U.S.C. due to absence without authority for at least three months, separation by reason of a sentence to confinement adjudged by a court-martial, or a sentence to confinement in a Federal or State penitentiary or correctional institution.
 TOP


22. How can servicemembers and schools get more information?
For additional information, please contact Wendy Macias, Office of Postsecondary Education, at Wendy.Macias@ed.gov or 202-502-7526.
OPE Policy Initiatives
 TOP
More at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/guid/readmission.html

Saturday, June 6, 2009

June 11/Seattle CLE: Interstate Compact on Educating Military Children

This training event is free to members of the Washington State Bar Association Section on Legal Assistance to Military Personnel (LAMP), which you can join easily before registering. It is part of the Section's periodic meeting and therefore aimed primarily at lawyers; however, if you are not an lawyer (and therefore not interested in CLE) but may be interested in the topic, contact the event host at dsmith@benbridge.com

Event Title:
The Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunities for Military Children

Time/Place:
Thursday, June 11th , 2009
11:30 a.m. ~ 1:00 p.m.
Ben Bridge Corporate Office
2901 3rd Avenue, 2nd Floor
Seattle, WA

1 CLE Credit applied for

Registration:
https://pro.wsba.org/forms/cle/Z90611.asp

Additional:
Please also return e-mail dsmith@benbridge.com if you plan to attend. You may elect to bring your own lunch, or a lunch will be provided for $10 by **advance order** no later than Monday, 6/8/09. E-mail dsmith@benbridge.com if you have any questions!

Friday, April 3, 2009

State Veteran Benefits catalogued by Military.com

Military.com has cataloged veterans' benefits on a state-by-state basis. You can pick your state from a regional map or by region:
It has a disclaimer:
"Veterans pursuing their educational goals are usually eligible for "educational assistance for students" in most states. Educational benefits for veterans and their dependents, particularly the children of deceased and disabled veterans, are also available in some states. Military.com has developed an on-line general summary of educational benefits for veterans and their dependents.

Please note: This summary presents only general information. It does not presume to be authoritative or complete, because this information changes from time to time."
... but the actual content goes beyond educational benefits, in some cases.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Military to College Guide, by Student Veterans of America

Student Veterans of America has published a handy PDF guide for veterans going to college, here.

Based on the experience of actual student-veterans, it includes sections such as "Veterans Education Benefits Checklist", "From Combat to College: Navigating the Transition" and Links to helps resources such as Troops to Teachers and VFW Military Scholarships. In my opinion, it would be improved by including a section on becoming a lawyer or other legal professional who can thereby better serve the veteran community, but that's a topic for another day.

See more at http://www.studentveterans.org/resourcelibrary/.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

GI Bill Implementation Plan

The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 or “New GI Bill” has been enacted into law, but how will it be implemented in reality is yet to be seen.

Military.com reports:
"VA Outlines Plans for New GI Bill Implementation - November 25, 2008

On Tuesday, November 18, 2008, the Department of Veterans Affairs offered details on their implementation plans for the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill Veterans Education Assistance Act of 2008. Keith Wilson, Director of the Office of Education Service, unveiled their interim plan to meet the requirements of benefits delivery in the short-term and long term.

According to Wilson, VA has begun improving the current information technology (IT) system internally in order to meet the August 2009 deadline and he expects to keep this system in place until November 2010.

Wilson told congress that the plan relies on increased automation and an expected increase in staffing of as much as 400 employees. The report indicates that VA will begin hiring in January and expects to be fully staffed by March 2009.

Mr. Wilson also detailed their long-term plan, expected to go into effect near the end of 2010. The long-term plan will rely on support from the Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) to help develop a permanent rules-based automated system.

Related Articles:
VA’s GI Bill Implementation Timeline

The full article by 10Meters.com.

Please read more about the Post 9/11 GI Bill on Military.com.

You are also encouraged to visit the VA GI Bill website to make sure you fact-check all the rumors and completely understand the new benefit and its purpose"

(Full Article Here)

Kudos to Military.com for reporting on this and other important issues. Check out its GI Bill Overview! And, when in doubt, check the official GI Bill website: http://www.gibill.va.gov/, especially its GI Bill FAQ.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Army Legal Education Program Accepting Applicants

From U.S. ARMY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S CORPS FUNDED LEGAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
"1. Description of program. The Funded Legal Education Program (FLEP) authorizes the selection of not more than 25 Active Duty Army officers (lieutenants or captains) each year to obtain a legal education at government expense. The JAGC expects to select approximately 25 applicants during the Fall 2008 selection board.

2. Eligibility and Application Procedures. Details regarding eligibility, the application process and service obligation with regards to FLEP are outlined in Army Regulation (AR 27-1), Chapter 14. The eligibility requirements in AR 27-1 are statutory and cannot be waived. The cutoff for eligibility is 6 years of total active federal service, including warrant officer or enlisted service, at the time legal training begins.

3. Selection criteria. When considering an applicant's file, the selection board members use the "total person concept". They evaluate the undergraduate and graduate school transcripts, LSAT score, ORB, OERs, SJA interview letter, and statement of motivation to attend law school ..."

More information, including whom to contact if interested: http://www.21tsc.army.mil/Aerja/Flep/Flep2.htm

And a thanks for the heads-up from Military.com and ArmyStudyGuide.com:

Monday, August 25, 2008

GI Bill 2008 FAQ & Support website


The "GI Bill 2008" website, originally created in support of passing the updated GI Bill, has (with that bill's passage) updated itself into a source of information about that bill. Its Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page accumulates and summarizes information from a variety of sources: http://www.gibill2008.org/faq.html. There's also other resources, such as a handy benefits calculator and an ongoing News Page.

See: http://www.gibill2008.org

Monday, July 21, 2008

New GI Bill Info from Armytimes.

Just more than a year from now, on Aug. 1, 2009, veterans' education benefits will undergo a life-changing transformation that will make a four-year college degree suddenly affordable for a new generation of wartime veterans.

Rick Maze of Armytimes.com just wrote about when benefits start, who will qualify and how much you may get: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/07/military_gibillexplained_072008w/

----
digg story

Thursday, June 19, 2008

GI Bill Compromise Today!

From GI Bill 2008 (a project of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America):
"After overwhelming bipartisan votes for a new GI Bill in the House and Senate, the White House has reached a compromise with House leadership to pass a new GI bill, modeled after Rep. Mitchell and Rep. Brown-Waite’s H.R. 5740. This WWII style GI bill will renew the social contract with our men and women in uniform and their families. This new GI Bill will not only fully fund the cost of an education, it will also allow servicemembers who stay in the military the opportunity to transfer their education benefits to spouses and their children.

The bipartisan agreement reached by the House Majority and Minority Leaders and endorsed by the White House is just one more shining example of the broad bipartisan support for this new GI Bill.

The best news is that the basic benefit structure of HR 5740 is still completely intact; the only substantive changes involve transferability. The White House’s included proposal for a permanent transferability program breaks down like this:
  • Six years of service, coupled with an additional service agreement of at least four years grants up to 36 months transferability. This 10-year commitment is similar to what our transferability amendment would have required for full 36-month transferability.
  • Spouses would be eligible to receive transferred benefits after the service member has reached six years.
  • To transfer to children, the service member would need to serve 10 years before transferring.
  • The Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs may prescribe regulations changing the years of service required.
  • There are no reporting requirements to Congress as our pilot program amendment had required.
  • They have included language to create similar transferability programs in the three existing GI educational benefit programs as well: Montgomery GI Bill (Ch. 30), Montgomery GI Bill-Select Reserve (1606), and the Reserve Educational Assistance Program (1607).
  • This transferability program has apparently been scored at $10 billion over 10 years, bringing the cost of the total package to $62 billion.
  • There is no offset for the GI bill, tax or otherwise.


This is a big victory for veterans and their families. We hope to see an overwhelming show of bipartisan Congressional support when this bill comes up for a vote later today.

Thank you from Senator Chuck Hagel

IAVA received the following letter from Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel, one of the original Senate sponsors of the new GI Bill (S.22): Click here to view the original (PDF):

Dear Paul and Friends,

As you know, the Webb-Hagel GI Bill passed both Houses of Congress with overwhelming bi-partisan support. The Senate’s vote last week (75-22) was a big win for us. We could not have made this progress without your organization’s strong support.

Thank you for your commitment and leadership in ensuring that we get this legislation passed and signed into law.

This effort is not over. I will continue to do all I can to see the Webb-Hagel GI Bill become a reality for America’s deserving veterans. Thanks again to you and your colleagues for all your help. We’re getting close!

Best wishes.

Learn More at http://www.gibill2008.org/news/

Friday, May 16, 2008

GI Bill 2008 progress

The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act (H.R. 5740), an attempt to give returning war veterans the same benefits of the original GI Bill, introduced in the House of Representatives by Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA), passed on May 15, 2008. Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America lists who voted for and against.
Now the action moves to the Senate, where the equivalent measure (S-22) has 57 co-sponsors.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

New tuition benefit for dependents of deceased, disabled Oregon veterans

From an Oregon University System (OUS) Press Release:

"The Oregon University System wants to ensure that all eligible dependents of veterans are aware of a new tuition benefit that begins today, Spring Term 2008, and which was approved by the Oregon Legislature in the February 2008 Supplemental Session.

The benefit provides a full tuition waiver for a bachelor’s or master’s degree at an OUS institution for a child or spouse of a member of the United States Armed Forces who either died in active duty, became 100% disabled in connection with military service, or died as a result of a disability sustained in active duty after September 11, 2001."

...Eligible children for the tuition waiver – including adopted or step children – must be 23 years old or younger at the time of application, be admitted to a bachelor’s or master’s degree program at an OUS campus, and must meet Oregon residency requirements. Eligible spouses must be un-remarried. Some programs may be excluded from the benefit such as certificate programs, additional undergraduate degrees, and distance education classes, among others. A waiver form, called the OUS Veterans’ Dependent Tuition Waiver Application, needs to be submitted to the Veterans Affairs Clerk at the applicable campus no later than 14 days before the applying term, with exceptions made on a case by case basis.

Chancellor of OUS, George Pernsteiner said, “All of Oregon’s public universities are proud to be able to offer this type of benefit to the Oregon families who have done so much for the state and this country. There is no way to compensate for the sacrifices made by these soldiers, but this is at least one acknowledgment we can make to offer our respect and gratitude for their service.”

Additional information on the tuition waiver as well as the application form can be found on the home page of the OUS website under “Featured Documents” at www.ous.edu, and is available at any of the seven OUS institutions: Eastern Oregon University (La Grande); Oregon Institute of Technology (Klamath Falls); Oregon State University (Corvallis); Portland State University (Portland); Southern Oregon University (Ashland); University of Oregon (Eugene); and Western Oregon University (Monmouth)."
MORE:

http://www.ous.edu/news_and_information/news/033108.php

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Some War Veterans Find GI Bill Falls Short

"Decades after the GI Bill transformed American society after World War II, another generation of veterans is returning home -- more than 800,000 as of last summer. What they find is quite different from the comprehensive benefits that once covered all the costs of an education, from undergraduate straight through Harvard Law.... "

This Washington Post article has useful information on several current legislative proposals ...
read more | digg story

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

GI Bill 2008

On the legislative front, efforts to modernize the GI Bill press forward against heavy White House opposition.

Per http://www.gibill2008.org/:
"The current educational benefits offered to veterans are far lower than the original GI Bill. Today, after paying a nonrefundable contribution from their first military paychecks, troops can receive a total of up to $39,600 towards their education. Unfortunately, this covers only 60-70% of the average cost of four years at a public college or university, or less than two years at a typical private college.


"In addition, structural problems and bureaucratic delays discourage veterans from using their GI Bill benefits. National Guardsmen and Reservists, including those who have served multiple combat tours, typically receive only a fraction of their GI Bill benefits. Moreover, 30% of troops who pay the nonrefundable $1,200 contribution do not end up using the GI Bill at all. These veterans have paid the government $230 million, but received nothing in return.

"Today’s veterans deserve a real reintegration program to help adjust to the civilian world. At the same time, a renewed GI Bill is a practical answer to the military’s troop shortage. Despite investing $4 billion in recruiting annually, the military has had serious problems recruiting high-caliber personnel. The Pentagon has responded by lowering age, education, and aptitude standards for new recruits, as well as upping the number of recruiters and increasing enlistment bonuses. These stopgap measures will not address long-term problems with recruiting, especially as the overall size of the armed forces is expanded.

"Rather than continuing to spend billions in bonuses for lower-standard enlistees, increasing GI Bill benefits would encourage high-aptitude young people to join the military. The GI Bill is the military’s single most effective recruitment tool: the number-one reason civilians join the military is to get money for college. As our military recovers and resets in the coming years, an expanded GI Bill will play a crucial role in ensuring that our military remains the strongest and most advanced in the world."

If you a World War II veteran and a beneficiary of the original GI Bill, or an Iraq or Afghanistan veteran who has had trouble paying for school, you can tell your story here.

Learn More: http://www.gibill2008.org/

Thursday, April 3, 2008

The Fund for Veterans Education

The Fund for Veterans’ Education was established by former Navy Lieutenant (now billionaire) Jerome Kohlberg to provide scholarships to veterans from all branches of the United States Armed Forces who served in Afghanistan or Iraq since September 11, 2001 and who are now enrolled in college or vocational-technical school.

According to its website, "Total maximum educational benefit over four years available to veterans who served with active duty units $39,636.; Average four year cost of attending a public university as an in state student $65,428; Average four year cost of a public university as an out of state student $105,216; Average four year cost of a private university $133,204."

Unless and until Congress gets its act together and passes a modern GI Bill, veterans who meet eligibility criteria can apply online for a scholarship: http://www.veteransfund.org/apply.php

Persons wishing to help the fund can find contact information at http://www.veteransfund.org/get_involved.php

Do your research, then be generous!

As Chris Moran reports in the San Diego Morning Tribute:

“This is something we owe,” Kohlberg said. Taking care of returning veterans is part of the cost of war as Kohlberg sees it, just like after World War II. Back then, Kohlberg had just finished three years in the Navy, a lieutenant in charge of the stores the U.S. military shopped at in Panama. When he returned, the U.S. government sent nearly 8 million veterans, including him, to school.

Kohlberg the veteran makes the moral argument that Congress needs to restore the compact between the warriors and their government. Kohlberg the capitalist makes an economic argument. The original GI Bill's massive swords-to-plowshares effort converted the world's mightiest military into a nation's middle class.
With the aid of the U.S. government, Kohlberg got a bachelor's degree from Swarthmore College, a master's degree from Harvard Business School and a law degree from Columbia University School of Law. In part because of the help they got from the government, Kohlberg said, his peers got better jobs and spent more money, paid more taxes and assumed more leadership roles in civilian life.

A new GI bill that covers all educational expenses of veterans is a good investment, one he estimates will pay five to 10 times its upfront amount. Kohlberg knows something about investments. As a pioneer of the leveraged buyout, he has amassed a $1.5 billion fortune that according to a Forbes list published this month makes him the world's 785th richest person.

Until Congress agrees to make that investment, Kohlberg will invest on his own.

There is another difference between now and then, Kohlberg said. The current wars have been financed largely by debt, while seemingly everyone in the nation sacrificed for the World War II effort, he said.

Kohlberg said he believes that even those who oppose the Iraq war as he does would agree that the nation must do more to support veterans of that war. “We're lucky we've been just sitting here on our duffs, all of us doing nothing for the war,” Kohlberg said. “We haven't even been asked.”

See full article here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20080326-9999-1m26kohlberg.html
KUDOS to VA Watchdog for publicizing this program!

Thursday, March 6, 2008

New GI Bill on Capitol Hill?

Senators Webb, Hagel, Lautenberg and Warner Introduce Improved Version of S.22

From IAVA.org:
"....A bipartisan coalition of Senators including Jim Webb (D-VA), Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) reintroduced the bill. They also announced Senator John Warner (R-VA) as one of four lead co-sponsors of the legislation. Senator Warner is a World War II and Korean War veteran and beneficiary of the original GI bill. He joins 32 other Senators in support of S.22.

The House companion bill (H.R. 2702) was introduced by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA) and currently has 96 cosponsors.

"Our country's newest generation of veterans deserves a World War II-style GI Bill, and today's reintroduction of S.22 is a major step toward achieving that," said Paul Rieckhoff, Executive Director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA). "IAVA is grateful to Senators Webb, Hagel, Lautenberg and Warner, themselves combat veterans and GI Bill beneficiaries, for their leadership on this critical issue. We've seen great momentum behind a new GI Bill, and we urge Congress to act quickly to pass this crucial legislation this year."


http://www.iava.org/component/option,com_/Itemid,67/option,content/task,view/id,2698/

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Some Educational Benefits Issues

According to an article by Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America:

"Today, 1.5 million troops are returning from Iraq and Afghanistan to a very different future than the one FDR made possible for the Greatest Generation. The current educational benefits offered to veterans are far lower than the original GI Bill. Today, after paying a nonrefundable contribution from their first military paychecks, troops can receive a total of up to $39,600 towards their education. Unfortunately, this covers only 60-70% of the average cost of four years at a public college or university, or less than two years at a typical private college.

In addition, structural problems and bureaucratic delays discourage veterans from using their GI Bill benefits. National Guardsmen and Reservists, including those who have served multiple combat tours, typically receive only a fraction of their GI Bill benefits.

Moreover, 30% of troops who pay the nonrefundable $1,200 contribution do not end up using the GI Bill at all. These veterans have paid the government $230 million, but received nothing in return."

Read the entire article: http://www.iava.org/component/option,com_/Itemid,66/option,content/task,view/id,2492/